In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once sustained the economy and offered jobs have vanished over time. Today, this area is designated as a “food desert,” indicating that numerous inhabitants reside a considerable distance from the nearest supermarket. Observing this problem, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016. She partnered with local farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruit and vegetables across the county, which has a demographic where nearly 30% of the population is Black and approximately 25% are living below the poverty line.
Initially, Ms. Ashby funded the initiative with her personal savings and small grants. However, in 2023, her efforts received a significant boost when the Walmart Foundation—the philanthropic branch of one of the nation’s largest corporations—granted her organization over $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was part of a broader $1.5 million initiative aimed at supporting “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she admitted. “It was one of those moments where you realize that someone truly sees and values your work.”
A mere two years ago, initiatives like this received extensive support from large companies throughout the U.S., as the nation confronted systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who lost his life beneath the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
However, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these commitments. In November, Walmart shared plans to end certain diversity efforts, with the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in financing Ms. Ashby’s grant, among them.
Companies like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have taken similar steps, indicating a wider corporate retreat from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This transition signifies a significant cultural shift, partly fueled by concerns over potential legal issues, regulatory examination, and negative reactions on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has actively sought to dismantle DEI programs, pushing for a shift back to “merit-based opportunity” in the U.S. He has directed the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and begin investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump ousted the nation’s top military general—a Black individual—after the defense secretary had earlier recommended his removal because of his connection to “woke” DEI strategies.
At first sight, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to better outcomes for racial and identity groups historically marginalized. However, some specialists propose that these efforts might continue, perhaps under alternative names that better align with the evolving political environment of a country that has recently elected a leader devoted to opposing “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Initiatives similar to DEI first gained traction in the U.S. during the 1960s, in reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to extend and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described with terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the systemic discrimination perpetuated under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements evolved to encompass women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the terminology surrounding these efforts broadened to include “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
Within businesses and government institutions, DEI efforts primarily targeted hiring strategies that portrayed diversity as a financial benefit. Supporters contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, though a significant focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal reform. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already maintained analogous leadership positions. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% allocated to people of color, based on Bloomberg’s findings.
Nonetheless, as swiftly as these initiatives grew, a conservative pushback arose.
Stefan Padfield, the executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals based on racial and gender differences.
More recently, critics have intensified their arguments that DEI efforts—originally designed to combat discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, particularly toward white Americans. Training sessions that highlight “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have drawn heavy criticism.
This opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic approach proposing that racism is intricately woven into American society. Over time, movements opposing CRT in educational settings transformed into broader endeavors to punish “woke corporations.”
Online platforms like End Wokeness and conservative personalities such as Robby Starbuck have leveraged this feeling, directing attention to companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for changes in policy at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his audience on social media.
One prominent success for this movement occurred in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Boycott calls targeting the brand and its parent firm, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, according to an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another major turning point arrived in June 2023, when the Supreme Court ruled that race could no longer be a factor in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This decision raised questions about the legal foundation of corporate DEI policies. After the ruling, Meta advised employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the termination of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI programs by major corporations prompts questions about the genuineness of their pledges to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many companies initially embraced DEI efforts to “look good” in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than out of genuine commitment to change.
Nevertheless, not all businesses are succumbing to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation pointed out that although DEI programs seem to be decreasing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies continue to incorporate DEI commitments in their official statements. Moreover, Apple shareholders recently chose to uphold the company’s diversity efforts.
Public sentiment on DEI remains split. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has diminished, yet support for related topics—such as equitable pay—remains robust. Likewise, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey discovered that a majority (56%) of working adults continue to perceive workplace DEI efforts as advantageous.
